🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.